Here, Butler swiftly takes up two colossal yet ultimately misguided tasks. In Zeno, Butler finds the origin of dialectical logic itself, and in particular, the method of indirect proof.Īfter this assessment of the historical origins of the dialectical method, Part Two explores the dialectical method in Hegel's own texts and attempts to reconstruct his method in relation to contemporary formal logic. From Sophocles, Butler aims to uncover a poetic root of the idea of dialectic through a tragic causality of fate, drawing primarily from Hegel's early theological writings. In Pythagoras, Butler finds the "historical root of speculative philosophy," where speculative philosophy consists in the "oneness of the individual human soul and the cosmos" (19, 20). Here, Butler emphasizes the influence of three figures in particular: Pythagoras, Sophocles, and Zeno. Part One explores historical precursors of Hegel's dialectical method in ancient Greek thought. The book is divided into three parts, proceeding in a roughly chronological order. In what follows, I will first briefly outline the contents of Butler's book, and then assess four theses that he defends. Clark Butler's new book is an ambitious attempt at rendering Hegel's infamous dialectical logic both respectable and useful for the philosophical present. ![]() The renewed interest in Hegel (though arguably there is not a major philosophical movement in the 19 th or 20 th century that does not stand in some relation to Hegel) has prompted scholars to continually find new ways of putting his often impenetrable texts in conversation with contemporary philosophy, a task that is undoubtedly necessary, but not without its potential difficulties. As is now widely acknowledged, English language scholarship on Hegel has thrived for at least the past thirty years, and interest in the Science of Logic in particular has continued to grow.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |